Having defined the three anchors (monumental, liturgical and textual) of Ambrosian remembrance, the investigation carried out in the lecture finds itself in the middle of the ford. We therefore take up the story from the moment when Ambrose became undesirable, i.e. during the Lombard eclipse, to dwell at greater length on the Carolingian crystallization of the Ambrosian memory: Angilbert II (824-859) was the first of the new Ambroiseans. The story of this mending of memory is a three-way game: popes, bishops, emperors. Under Gregory VII, the agreement between Rome and Milan took place under the benevolent shadow of Ambrose, and Bernard de Clairvaux was designated by Geoffroy d'Auxerre in 1163 as Ambrosius redivivus. But during the troubles of the Pataria and pre-communist effervescence, the spectre of Ambrose returned. Through analysis of the nomen ambrosii in Andrea de Strumi, Bonizon de Sutri, Arnulf de Milan and Pierre Damien, we attempt to show that this is a disputed memory, never compromised by any of the opposing camps. A monumental analysis of the Porta romana, , by which civic memory in March 1171 conjured up the urbanicidal gesture and ritual of public humiliation imposed on the Lombard capital by Emperor Frederick Barbarossa, completes the picture: Milan is indeed the new Rome.
11:00 - 12:00
Lecture
Popes, bishops and emperors
Patrick Boucheron