If tyranny requires a fictional detour in order to be considered historically, this is because it involves an enunciative and political despotism. This is the basic hypothesis of this year's lecture: an equivalence, or homology, between the art of governing and the art of storytelling, which implies tying the fiction of tyranny to the tyranny of fiction. This, for example, is what 20th-century Spanish-American novels document, and in particular the narrative sub-genre known as the "dictator novel", when it lends its voice to a paper tyrant, both burlesque and disquieting. This introductory session aims first of all to recall the main methodological contributions of the previous year's lecture on political fiction, recalling with Jacques Rancière that "what distinguishes fiction from ordinary experience is not a lack of reality, but an excess of rationality". Political fiction thus appears as a magnifying glass, enabling us to observe, after the fact, the harbingers of historical change. These hypotheses are put to the test in a case study: the dramatization of Louis XIII's political project in the ballet dance La Délivrance de Renaud (January 29, 1617), a fictional foretaste of his seizure of power. As in Mario Vargas Llosa's La Fête au bouc (2000), burlesque disorder is a carnivalesque inversion of power. To thwart the narrative's traps, we must, like Louis Marin, follow the "light and skilful narrators".
11:00 - 12:00