Does the temporal fragmentarism that runs counter to the constitution imply the non-reality of time? It is possible to take up the problem of unreality from the contradiction of temporal fragments. Time is not only indexical, equivalent to that which changes, it is also and perhaps incoherent. It's a new path to profound unreality.
Frédéric Nef, born 1947, agrégé in philosophy, doctorate in logic, doctorate in philosophy. Retired Director of Studies at EHESS. Author of a trilogy: L'objet quelconque (1998), Les propriétés des choses (2006), L'anti-Hume (2017) and numerous other books and articles on semantics, metaphysics and the history of philosophy. These include Qu'est-ce que la métaphysique (Gallimard, 2005), La force du vide (Seuil, 2011). Numerous study and research stays in Italy, USA, Colombia, Germany. Editor of several collections of texts, including La métaphysique contemporaine in collaboration with E. Garcia (coll. textes clés, Vrin), and L'ontologie analytique, in collaboration with Y. Schmitt (coll. textes clés, Vrin) and L'actualité de Leibniz in collaboration with Dominique Berlioz (Steiner Verlag).
