Abstract
My aim in this talk is to examine Chalmers' veridicalism, and more precisely i) to indicate a reason to doubt the cogency of one of his' arguments for veridicalism, ii) to argue that if BIVs' ordinary beliefs are true for the reasons indicated by Chalmers, then BIVs' (metaphysical) beliefs about the fundamental nature of reality also are true, and iii) to advance that it could be that BIVs' are right about the fundamental nature of reality while being ignorant of it.
