Abstract
Reasons to act and reasons to believe seem fundamentally different. But are they not based on the same structures? Kant maintained that it is always one and the same reason that, whether from a theoretical or practical point of view, judges according to a priori principles(KPV, V, 121). See also.
After examining some contemporary attempts at unification, I will argue that the epistemic norms governing the realm of theoretical reasons are not the same as those governing the realm of practical reasons.
