This year's 2010-2011 lecture was the third in a series of "revisits" to Confucius and his Talks that began two years ago, and whose starting point was the contemporary phenomenon of Confucius' resurgence after a century of systematic demolition of this emblematic figure and all that he represented for Chinese modernists. It was in the name of modernity, whose model in their eyes could only be Western, that Chinese intellectuals at the beginning of the 20th century resolved to throw Confucius and traditional culture as a whole overboard. This process of destruction began at institutional level in 1905 with the abolition of the civil examination system, which rendered obsolete the in-depth knowledge of the Confucian classics deemed indispensable for centuries to the servants of the imperial state, which in fact collapsed definitively a few years later, in 1911, giving way to the very first republic founded by Sun Yat-Sen. The symbolic dates that the history of the 20th century has retained are generational markers that include the movement of May 4 1919, the proclamation of the People's Republic in 1949, the Cultural Revolution of the years 1966-76 and, finally, the student movement of spring 1989, crushed in bloodshed on June 4 . Yet it was in the autumn of that same year, just three months after the Tian'anmen massacre and three months before the fall of the Berlin Wall, that the 2 540th anniversary of the birth of Confucius was celebrated with great fanfare in Beijing. Clearly, such a sudden rehabilitation was intended to help restore legitimacy to leaders who had just lost it in the eyes of the new generation. The return of Confucius, so widely instrumentalized in mainland China, was the subject of the first part of the lecture.
In a second time, the perspective has been opened up to the fortunes of Confucius and his Entretiens closer to home, in Europe, with the aim of contextualizing our reading habits, now so deeply rooted that we no longer realize it. Two Confucius can be broadly distinguished, corresponding to two major " universalist " moments in Western history : first, the Confucius inherited from the Enlightenment ; then, the Confucius born of the world that emerged from the two world conflicts of the last century, and which is often referred to as the " post-Enlightenment ". The first moment, which was the subject of last year's lecture, concerns Europe and more specifically France where, in the 17th-18th centuries, those then known as the " philosophes " relied on the testimonies of Jesuit missionaries to invent a " Confucius, philosophe des Chinois " in the image of the Enlightenment and to read the Entretiens as a philosophical work. Just a few decades later, this first co-optation by Voltaire, Leibniz and many others was considered null and void by the professional philosophers of conquering Europe in the 19th century, led by Hegel. China, excluded from a reconfigured philosophical space, became the specific object of a new discipline of European academic knowledge, Sinology.