Sergej Bolelov, who is currently in charge of the excavation, has considered the implications of the above observations [1]. He considers the possibility that the generalization of small residential structures within micro-neighborhoods would express "the ultimate stage in the break-up of patriarchal families ", but this idea clashes, on the one hand, with the absence of reception rooms that would have been an obligatory element of "patriarchal" residences at the earlier stage, and, on the other, with the fact that the town only lived for two generations. He therefore comes to assume a homogeneous, modest class of military dependents living in families. This is consistent with the perceptible absence of an urban elite (none of the premises are decorated with wall paintings), the artistic mediocrity of the objects and the relative abundance of military equipment in the finds. This leads us to assume that the Kushan power was engaged in a planned strategic urbanization operation, designed to guard the northern route (which would ultimately prevent the Sassanids from delivering the fatal blow to the empire). Kampyrtepa would therefore be part of a defensive chain comprising, to the north, the fortified lock of the "Iron Gates" of Derbent, the empire's northern frontier, and to the south, the military colony of Zadiyan protecting Bactres (see below). Similar hypotheses as to the voluntarist nature of the urban settlement have been put forward for Termez, which took over the functions of Kampyrtepa after its abandonment [2].
If the excavators wanted to recognize so many "neighborhood chapels", it's partly because they didn't find a temple, but this could well have been in the lost area, near the river, as the examples of Termez and Takht-i Sangin suggest. The mobile religious material represented by the terracotta figurines reveals a virtual absence of Buddhism, a situation that is not found in any other Kushan city and could be explained by the early abandonment of the site: we now know that Buddhism only really took root in Bactria from the end of the 1st c. n. è. and that its influence was still quite limited under Kanishka. The two out-of-wall necropolises follow the same "Zoroastro-compatible" ritual as the other known sites (bodies are laid to rest without prior emaciation, but still without contact with the earth).
References
[1] In Materialy Tokharistanskoj Èkspeditsii, 6, 2006, pp. 15-80 (report on the excavation of "Quarter 10").
[2] S. Stride, "Regions and territories in Southern Central Asia: What the Surkhan Darya province tells us about Bactria" , in J. Cribb, G. Herrmann (eds.), After Alexander. Central Asia before Islam, Oxford, 2007, pp. 99-117.