More attention was paid to " ultimate works " in painting and music than in literature, to Schubert 's Schwanengesang , to Poussin's L'Hiver. In part, but not exclusively, this was a reflection on the end of literary careers, with models as distant as Rimbaud and Philip Roth. A corollary question would be : is there such a thing as a "beyond writing" or, more simply, an "after "? Roland Barthes tackled this challenge head-on at the start of his last lecture on La Préparation du roman : can we stop writing, he asked ?
The ends of literature, then, would be completion and incompletion, denouement and prolongation, retreat and renewal, but also intention or purpose, to the exclusion, of course, of cessation for good.
The title " Fins de la littérature " is polysemous. The words " end " - in the plural - and " literature " have become ; the simplest way of linking them seemed to be the preposition de, which suggests multiple resonances. Ends are the end, the completion, the culmination, the achievement, but also the goal, the intention, the aim, the design, or the result. Ends are also the confines, the limits of literature, referring to an ever-present debate : can literature say everything ? Barthes comments on Valéry, evoking " literature as the art of deception ". In other words, literature deceives, abuses and disappoints ; at best, it disappoints for the better, according to the Swiss usage of the verb.