Abstract
2.6.2. Comedy : the intertwined destinies of Aristophanes and Menander (continued)
Menander's decline due to the increasingly profound mismatch between Menander's language and the linguistic tastes of Late Antiquity ?
This explanation is based on a passage by the Attic grammarian Phrynichos(Eklogê, 394), but the argument cannot be accepted, since the authors of rhetoric textbooks continue to make Menander a benchmark for language and discourse.
Wouldn't Menander's Sentences have suffocated Menander's comedies ?
The compilation of a collection of maxims allegedly extracted from Menander's theater in the 1st century was so successful that it conferred on Menander the stature of both a sage and a master of eloquence, and led to him being one of the authors most used by schoolmasters for his sentences(gnômai). But does this explain why people stopped reading his comedies ?
In fact, the relative treatment of statistical data reveals that Menander remained remarkably popular throughout the period, showing that the growing popularity of his sentences in no way affected the reading of comedies by the same author.
2.7. Prose
2.7.1. The orators
Of the great Attic orators, only Demosthenes and Isocrates continued to be read over the long term, with Isocrates surpassing Demosthenes in the 6thcentury : the philosophical dimension with which he was invested led him to become a model of eloquence at the service of moral edification. As for the representatives of the Second Sophistic, Aelius Aristides was still highly appreciated in the late period: in addition to their rhetorical value, his speeches have a historical interest (they deal nostalgically with the golden age of Hellenism) that makes them a first-rate teaching aid .