If "history is that laborious dream effect by which we lift ourselves from night to day, from death to life" (Jules Michelet, "Avenir? Avenir?", 1842), then a historical reflection on the fictional power of tyranny can enable us to envisage today's tyrannies. So, the investigation resumes in front of the attractive tyrant painted by Ambrogio Lorenzetti in Siena's Palazzo Pubblico in 1338: is he wearing a mask, or has he just been unmasked? The question of a power that caricatures itself to disarm in advance any possibility of subversive criticism raises the question of the relationship between pastiche and postiche, a question we'll return to at the very end of the lecture. For the time being, however, this first introductory session continues with an effort at definition, taking into account the work of literary criticism on fictio and figura, between artifactual theories and the risks of panfictionalism. We propose a deflationary critique of fiction as an experience of thought in tension between the mimetic and axiomatic poles. From then on, political fiction can be defined as a narrative form of political theory or, with Michel Foucault, a test of thought which, from the past, produces "truth effects" on the present and sheds light on future politics.
11:00 - 12:00