The Optimal Rule of Decision-making for Areopagus: Argued Voting or Apparent Consensus?

Moderator: Stéphanie Novak

Speaker(s)

Philippe Urfalino

CSTA, EHESS

Events

The Optimal Rule of Decision-making for Areopagus: Argued Voting or Apparent Consensus?

Microfoundations of Collective Wisdom

Group Deliberation and the Revision of Individual Judgments: A Social-Choice-Theoretic Perspecti…

Democracy Counts: Why Rulers should be Numerous?

Democratic Reason: the Mechanisms of Collective Intelligence in Politics

Majorities against Utility: Implications of the Failure of the Miracle of Aggregation

Rational Ignorance and Beyond

The Wisdom of International Decisions

Many-minds Arguments in Legal Theory

Symposium

23 May 2008

16:45 - 17:45

Dan Sperber et Hugo Mercier

The Optimal Rule of Decision-making for Areopagus: Argued Voting or Apparent Consensus?

Deciding, Predicting, Judging

Speaker(s)

Philippe Urfalino

Events

Introduction

The Wisdom of Crowds Reconsidered

What Has Collective Wisdom to do with Wisdom?

Collaborative Filtering: the Wisdom of the Internet

The Optimal Design of a Constitution-making Process

The Optimal Rule of Decision-making for Areopagus: Argued Voting or Apparent Consensus?

Microfoundations of Collective Wisdom

Group Deliberation and the Revision of Individual Judgments: A Social-Choice-Theoretic Perspecti…

Democracy Counts: Why Rulers should be Numerous?

Democratic Reason: the Mechanisms of Collective Intelligence in Politics

Majorities against Utility: Implications of the Failure of the Miracle of Aggregation

Rational Ignorance and Beyond

The Wisdom of International Decisions

Many-minds Arguments in Legal Theory

Reasoning as a Social Activity

See also